Jun 18, 2012

The Woman in Black almost bores you to death.

I mean...I don't....I'm speechless.

What the fuck was this?! It was being presented as a horror-thriller, something that Daniel Radcliffe probably decided to do to get his Harry Potter stigmata off of him.

Dear Daniel, you're always going to be Harry, do us a favour and stop acting. What's the point? Also, he is completely wrong for this role, his physique does not match one of a father to a young child - which is 80% of this movie's plot. He looks absolutely ridiculous. The other 20% belong to "the woman in black" who barely makes an appearance and when she does, with all that screaming, you wished she didn't.

Apparently, the flop of this movie was not great enough to stop them from making a sequel, or as one article claims, "a franchise". Dear god.

There are too many implicitly bad scenes here, stupid, stupid sub-plots and retarded dialogues, but the ending....oh, the ending....makes this whole disaster seem on a level of a radionuclear leak.

Ciaran Hinds, who already had a devastatingly bad experience with Ghost Rider:Vengeance apparently decided it was not enough - self destruction is imminent. I suppose he desperately needs money...or he's mentally unstable. Why, Caesar, why?!!

5 out of 10.